Proven Case Results
When your reputation, freedom and livelihood are on the line, it is important that you have an attorney who is an experienced proven advocate that has gotten real and substantial results. The highly skilled legal team here at My Rights Law has successfully handled thousands of criminal cases for our clients in Los Angeles County, Orange County, San Bernardino County and Riverside County in the Inland Empire. We are very proud of the results we have been able to achieve for our clients over the years.
Riverside Superior Court – Southwest Court Murrieta
Charges: Our client was charged with a DUI with Collision. The District Attorney wanted 60 days of work release and 180 days of alcohol monitoring ankle bracelet
Results: We got our client a reduced charge of wet reckless, an alcohol class and fines!
San Bernardino Superior Court – Victorville
Charges: Our client was charged with a 2nd time DUI. The District Attorney wanted 60 days of custody and an ignition interlock device installed into client’s car.
Results: We got our client a reduced charge of wet reckless, an alcohol class and fines!
San Bernardino Superior Court – Victorville
Charges: Our client was charged with boating under the influence (BUI). The District Attorney wanted 20 days of work release, an alcohol class and fines.
Results: Case dismissed!
San Diego Superior Court
Charges: Our client was charged with a DUI with a high blood alcohol content and excessive speed. The District Attorney wanted 60 days in custody time for the DUI speed enhancement, 3 years’ probation and a nine-month alcohol class
Results: We got our client a wet reckless a 12-hour alcohol class and a fine!
San Bernardino Superior Court – San Bernardino
Charges: Our client was charged with a Solicitation of prostitution. The District Attorney wanted to convict our client which would result in his divorce and job loss.
Results: Case dismissed!
San Bernardino Superior Court – San Bernardino
Charges: Our client was charged with a felony probation violation. Probation and District Attorney wanted to impose the three-year suspended prison sentence.
Results: We got our client reinstated on formal probation without having to admit the probation violation!
Rancho Cucamonga Superior Court – Rancho Cucamonga
Charges: Felony probation violation. Probation wanted 3 years.
Results: We got our client reinstated on community supervison with no additional jail time!
Rancho Cucamonga Superior Court – Rancho Cucamonga
Charges: Our client was charged with evading
Results: We got our client’s charge reduced to reckless driving, no jail time!
Rancho Cucamonga Superior Court – Rancho Cucamonga
Charges: Our client was charged with resisting arrest, criminal threats, and assault with a weapon.
Results: Through the great work of our attorney’s, our client was granted a mental health diversion and a dismissal of all counts upon successful completion of program
Rancho Cucamonga Superior Court – Rancho Cucamonga
Charges: Shooting in inhabited dwelling and felony probation violation. Exposure of 8 years in prison.
Results: We were able to get the sentence reduced to only 16 months for both cases!
Charges: Health and Safety code 11352, possession with intent to distribute over 20kg of cocaine. Our client had exposure to over 20 years in custody!
Results: Through extensive investigative measures, we were able to find inaccuracies in the DEA’s and police’s investigation that lead to the traffic stop. As a result, we were able to reduce the 20 year custody exposure our client was facing to only 16 months!
Charges: VC 23152 A/B DUI involving alcohol. Our client had failed to complete an 18-month DUI class after receiving multiple violations for failing to complete the course. Our client faced an 8 month jail sentence for not completing the DUI class.
Results: Through a thoughtful mitigation packet, we were able to get the client reinstated into the DUI class and receive we were able to reduce the 8 month jail sentence our client was facing to ZERO JAIL TIME!
Charges: Penal Code 288 meeting a minor for sex. Our client was accused of violating probation terms and faced an exposure of over 2 years in custody.
Results: Through extensive research of various rehab facilities, we were able to reduce our client’s 2 years in custody to we were able to reduce the 2 year custody exposure our client was facing to ZERO JAIL TIME and have client enroll in an in-patient rehab facility!
Charges: Health and Safety code 11352, possession with intent to distribute over 3kg of cocaine. Our client had exposure to over 5 years in custody
Results: After thoroughly reviewing all search warrants and all available evidence, our attorneys were able to find a crucial error that did not comply with search warrant requirements. As a result, we were able to reduce the 5 year custody exposure our client was facing to ZERO JAIL TIME and only house arrest!
Charges: Penal Code 247, shooting into an inhabited dwelling/moving vehicle. Our client had exposure to over 10 years in custody and a suspended driver’s license for 1 year.
Results: After investigating relevant 911 calls and dashcam footage, we were able to reduce the 10 year custody exposure our client was facing to ONLY HOUSE ARREST and NO DRIVERS LICENSE SUSPENSION!
Charges: Our client was charged with domestic violence that was affecting his employment out of Joshua Tree, CA.
Results: We filed an expungement with the court to have the charge dismissed and got the expungement granted!
Charges: Our client had 2 felony counts against him out of the Victorville court – assault with a deadly weapon causing great bodily injury (GBI) and domestic violence. He already had one strike against him for robbery and other priors including domestic violence. He had just gotten out of prison, has a 6-month old baby, and was facing a 2nd strike with 15 years in State Prison.
Results: After extensive negotiations and chamber conferences, we were able to get his charges reduced with NO STRIKE. We resolved his sentence to felony false imprisonment, down from 15 years to 18 months! He’ll happily be back home with his family in a year and a half, not 15 years!
Charges: Our client was declared as a negligent operator by the Modesto DMV due to multiple traffic violations (points) on her license, which results in a suspension or revocation of your license.
Results: She was facing 1 year suspension but, we won the hearing and were able to reverse the suspension!
Charges: Our client was about to take her nursing boards exam but had a prior petty theft charge (484 pc) on her record that was affecting her out of Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Results: We filed an expungement with the court to have the charge dismissed and the expungement was granted!
Charges: Our client was facing 6 years in jail for violating her felony probation from a drug related case(182 (a)(1) pc and 11378 H&S) out of San Bernardino, CA.
Results: We fought zealously and were able to get her probation reinstated with credit for time served!
Charges: Our client came to us with a prior felony conviction for possession of child porn (311.1(a) pc) out of Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Results: Our office was able to file a motion to terminate his felony probation after only 1 year, while simultaneously getting his felony charge reduced to a misdemeanor!
Charges: Our client was being charged with driving with a suspended license due to a DUI (14601.2 vc) which carries mandatory jail time out of Rancho Cucamonga, CA.
Results: We were able to get the charge reduced to a 14601.1 vc, which does not carry jail time and all our client had to do was pay her court fines.
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor DUI (VC 23152 (A) & (B)) out of the Rancho Cucamonga courthouse.
Results: After extensive negotiations with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to get the case dismissed!
Charges: Client was charged with attempted robbery out of the San Bernardino Juvenile court.
Results: After extensive negotiations with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to get the case dismissed and sealed!
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor possession of dangerous drug/controlled substance (HS11377 (A)) out of the Rancho Cucamonga courthouse.
Results: After extensive negotiations with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to get the case dismissed!
Charges: Client was charges with a misdemeanor driving under the influence (VC23152 (A)) out of the Rancho Cucamonga courthouse.
Results: After negotiating with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to reduce the DUI charge to a wet reckless (VC 23103)!
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor DUI (VC 23152 (A) & (B)) out of the Rancho Cucamonga courthouse.
Results: After negotiating with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to reduce the DUI charge to a wet reckless (VC 23103)!
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor possession of methamphetamine (HS11377) out of the Pomona courthouse.
Results: After extensive negotiations with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to get the case dismissed!
Charges: Client was charged with three misdemeanor counts of contempt of court for disobeying court order (PC166 (A)(4)), battery (PC242) and vandalism under $1000 damage (PC594 (A)) out of the San Bernardino courthouse.
Results: After extensive negotiations with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to get our client work release and probation.
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor DUI (VC 23152 (A) & (B)) out of the Rancho Cucamonga courthouse.
Results: After negotiating with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to reduce the DUI charge to a wet reckless (VC 23103)!
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor reckless driving (VC 23103(A)) out of the Victorville courthouse.
Results: After negotiating with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to reduce the charge to an infraction!
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor DUI (VC 23152 (A) & (B)) out of the Rancho Cucamonga courthouse.
Results: After extensive negotiations with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to reduce the DUI charge to a wet reckless (VC 23103)!
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor DUI (VC 23152 (A) & (B)) out of the Rancho Cucamonga courthouse.
Results: After extensive negotiations with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to reduce the charge to a wet reckless (VC 23103)!
Charges: Client was charged a misdemeanor possession of dangerous drug/controlled substance (HS11377(A)) out of the Rancho Cucamonga court.
Results: After extensive negotiations with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to get the case dismissed!
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor DUI (VC 23152 (A) & (B)) out of the Rancho Cucamonga courthouse.
Results: After negotiating with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to reduce the DUI charge to a wet reckless charge (VC 23103)!
Charges: Client was charged with 9 misdemeanor cases of possession of narcotics (HS11350), possession of a controlled substance (BP4060), possession of a controlled substance- paraphernalia (HS11364), under the influence of a controlled substance (HS11550(A)), failure to appear after a written promise (PC853.7) and possession of a dangerous drug/controlled substance (HS11377(A)) out of the Rancho Cucamonga courthouse.
Results: After extensive negotiations with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to get 8 out of the 9 cases dismissed! Our client will only need to complete a rehab program in order to dismiss the last case.
Charges: Client was charged with three misdemeanor counts of battery against a peace officer (PC243(B)) out of the Rancho Cucamonga courthouse.
Results: After negotiating with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to reduce the charge to a resisting arrest charge (PC69). Our client will only need to complete a work release program and pay a small fine.
Charges: Client was charged with driving with a blood alcohol content over 0.08% out of the San Bernardino Driver Safety Office.
Results: Our attorneys were able to get a set aside for our client! No action will be taken against his license.
Charges: Client was charged with four felony counts of possession of a dangerous drug/controlled substance, unlawful use identifying or information and making, possessing, uttering fictious instrument (HS11377 (A), PC530.5 (A) & PC476) out of the Rancho Cucamonga courthouse.
Results: After negotiating with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to get our client community service and probation.
Charges: Client was charged with two felony counts of sexual penetration against a victim’s will by force/duress and sexual battery (PC289(A)(1) & PC243.4(A)) out of the Victorville courthouse. The case drew a lot of media attention as it involved a licensed Marriage and Family Therapist and one of his patients.
Results: Our attorneys worked hard on this case for over a year before taking it to trial. The jury trial lasted two weeks and after all was said and done, the jury found our client not guilty on both counts! He can finally start to move on whit his life again now.
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor DUI (VC 23152 (A) & (B)) out of the Rancho Cucamonga courthouse.
Results: After negotiating with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to reduce the DUI charges to a wet reckless charge (VC 23103)!
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor for vandalism under $1000 damage (PC 594(A)) out of the Rancho Cucamonga courthouse.
Results: After negotiating with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to get the case dismissed!
Charges: Client was charged with a felony for sale- transportation of more than 28.5G of Marijuana or more than 4G concentrated (HS11360(A)(3)(D)) out of the Rancho Cucamonga courthouse.
Results: After extensive negotiations with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to get our client into the work release program and probation.
Charges: Client was charged with three felony counts of possession of a controlled substance for sale and possession of a controlled substance while armed with a loaded firearm (HS11378 & HS11370.1(A)) out of the Rancho Cucamonga courthouse.
Results: After extensive negotiations with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to get our client into the work release program and probation.
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor DUI (VC 23152 (A) & (B)) out of the West Covina courthouse. The stakes were high due to the fact that this was our client’s 2nd DUI and our client has a Class A license.
Results: After extensive negotiations with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to reduce the DUI charge to a wet reckless charge (VC 23103) and our client was able to get his Class A license back!
Charges: Client was charged with two felony counts of burglary and grand theft over $400 (PC459 & PCM487(A)) out of Riverside County.
Results: After extensive negotiations with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to get our client work release and summary probation
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor DUI for being under the influence of a drug (VC 23152(E)) out of the Rancho Cucamonga courthouse.
Results: After negotiating with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to reduce the DUI charge to a wet reckless (VC 23103)!
Charges: Client was charged with two felony counts of shooting at an inhabited dwelling and shooting at an unoccupied dwelling (PC246 & PC247 (B)) out of the Rancho Cucamonga courthouse. Our client suffered from mental illnesses and needed treatment rather than incarceration.
Results: After negotiating with the District Attorney and presenting lots of medical documentation on behalf of our client, our attorneys were able to get our client into an inpatient program and formal probation.
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor for possession of a dangerous drug/controlled substance (HS 11377 (A)) out the San Bernardino courthouse.
Results: After negotiating with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to get the case dismissed!
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor for being drunk in public (PC647 (F)) out of the Rancho Cucamonga courthouse.
Results: Our attorneys got the case dismissed!
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor DUI (VC 23152 (A) & (B)) out of the Rancho Cucamonga courthouse.
Results: After extensive negotiations with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to reduce the DUI charge to a wet reckless charge (VC 23103).
Charges: Client was charged with three misdemeanor counts of driving under the influence, driving under the influence of alcohol above 0.08% or more and driving while license was suspended for driving under the influence (VC23152(A), VC23152(B) & VC14601.2(A)) out of the Rancho Cucamonga courthouse.
Results: After extensive negotiations with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to get the case dismissed!
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor for lewd or dissolute conduct in a public place (PC647(A)) out of the Rancho Cucamonga courthouse.
Results: After negotiating with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to get our client to pay fees/fines and probation.
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor for a hit and run (VC20002(A)) out of the San Bernardino courthouse.
Results: After negotiating with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to get the case dismissed!
Charges: Client was charged with a felony for fraud to obtain aid (WI10980(C)(2)) out of the San Bernardino courthouse.
Results: Our attorneys were able to reduce the charge to a misdemeanor! Our client will have topay restitution and be on summary probation for a short period of time.
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor for inflicting a corporal injury on a spouse/cohabitant out of the Rancho Cucamonga courthouse.
Results: After extensive negotiations with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to get the case dismissed!
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor for being drunk in public (PC647 (F)) out of the Rancho Cucamonga courthouse.
Results: Our attorneys were able to get the case dismissed!
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor for being drunk in public (PC647 (F)) out of the Rancho Cucamonga courthouse.
Results: Our attorneys were able to get the case dismissed!
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor DUI (VC 23152 (A) & (B)) out of the Rancho Cucamonga courthouse.
Results: After extensive negotiations with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to reduce the DUI charge to a wet reckless charge (VC 23103).
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor for being drunk in public (PC647 (F)) out of the San Bernardino courthouse.
Results: Our attorneys were able to get the case dismissed!
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor for being drunk in public (PC647 (F)) out of the Victorville courthouse.
Results: Our attorneys were able to get the case dismissed!
Charges: Client was charged with soliciting prostitution (PC 647(B)) out of the Pomona courthouse.
Results: After extensive negotiations with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to get the case dismissed!
Charges: Client was charged with two misdemeanor counts of possession of dangerous/controlled substance and use/under influence of controlled substance (HS 11377(A)) & HS 11550(A)) out of the Rancho Cucamonga courthouse.
Results: After negotiating with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to get the case dismissed!
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor resisting arrest (PC 148(A)(1)) out of the Rancho Cucamonga courthouse.
Results: After extensive negotiations with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to get the case dismissed!
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor DUI (VC 23152 (A) & (B)) out of the Rancho Cucamonga courthouse. The client had a high blood alcohol content of 0.25.
Results: After extensive negotiations with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to reduce the charge to a wet reckless charge (VC 23103)!
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor DUI (VC 23152 (A) & (B)) out of the San Bernardino courthouse. The client had a high blood alcohol content and a prior DUI.
Results: After negotiating with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to reduce the charge to a wet reckless charge (VC 23103).
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor for resisting arrest (PC 148(A)(1)) out of the Rancho Cucamonga courthouse.
Results: Our attorneys were able to get the case dismissed!
Charges: Client was charged out of the Rancho Cucamonga courthouse with a felony for inflicting corporal injuries on his spouse and criminal threats which will result in death or great bodily injury (PC 273.5(A) & PC 422(A)).
Results: After extensive negotiations with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to get our client formal probation and get him into a domestic violence program.
Charges: Client was charged out of the Rancho Cucamonga courthouse with two misdemeanor counts of possession of a dangerous drug/controlled substances (HS 11377(A)).
Results: After negotiating with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to get the case dismissed!
Charges: Client was charged out of the Rancho Cucamonga courthouse with a misdemeanor DUI, carrying an exposed unloaded handgun in his vehicle and evading a peace officer (VC 23152 (A) & (B), PC 26350 (A)(2) & VC 2800.1 (A)).
Results: After extensive negotiations with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to reduce the charge to a wet reckless charge (VC 23103)!
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor DUI and unlawful combined influence of alcohol and drugs while driving (VC 23152(B) & (F)) out of the Rancho Cucamonga courthouse.
Results: After negotiating with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to reduce the charges to a wet reckless charge (VC 23103).
Charges: Client was charged with a felony DUI causing bodily injury (VC 23153 (A) & (B)) out of the Rancho Cucamonga courthouse.
Results: After extensive negotiations with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to get the case dismissed!
Charges: Client was charged with a felony assault with a deadly weapon, criminal threats which will result in death or great bodily injury, use of a deadly weapon, false imprisonment and inflicting corporal injury on a spouse (PC 245(A)(1), PC 422(A)-F, PC 12022(B)(1), PC 236-F, & PC 273.5(A)-F) out of the Rancho Cucamonga courthouse.
Results: After extensive negotiations with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to get all of the charges dismissed!
Charges: Client was charged with a felony for inflicting corporal injury on a spouse, assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury, criminal threats which will result in death or great bodily injury, possession/purchase for sale narcotic/controlled substance and willful cruelty to a child (PC 273.5(A)-F, PC 245(A)(4)-F, PC 422(A)-F, HS11251-F & PC 273A(B)-M) out of the Rancho Cucamonga courthouse.
Results: After negotiating with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to get our client formal probation.
Charges: Client was charged with a felony for welfare fraud out of the San Bernardino courthouse in addition to two counts of perjury (WI10980(C)(2) & PC118(A)-F). The client was a licensed professional and any conviction on her record would mean her losing her license and ability to support herself and her family. The stakes were very high.
Results: After extensive negotiations with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to get the case dismissed!
Charges: Client was a minor and was charged out of the Rancho Cucamonga courthouse with a misdemeanor for having a fake ID and providing false information to a police officer (BP25661(A) & PC148.9(A)).
Results: Our attorneys were able to the case dismissed!
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor for shoplifting (PC 459) out of the Rancho Cucamonga courthouse.
Results: Our attorneys were able to the case dismissed!
Charges: Client was charged with two misdemeanor counts for being in possession of a dangerous controlled substance, possession of a controlled substance – paraphernalia and use/under influence of controlled substance (HS11377(A), HS11364 and HS11550(a)) out of the Rancho Cucamonga courthouse.
Results: Our attorneys were able to get our client into a rehab program and get all of the charges dismissed!
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor for use/under influence of controlled substance (HS 11550(A)) out of the Rancho Cucamonga courthouse.
Results: Our attorneys were able to get the case dismissed!
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor DUI (VC 23152 (A) & (B)) out of the Rancho Cucamonga courthouse. Due to having a commercial license, stakes were high – his career was on the line.
Results: After extensive negotiations with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to reduce the DUI charge to a wet reckless charge (VC 23103) and our client was able to get his Class A license back!
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor out of the Rancho Cucamonga courthouse for an assault with a deadly weapon (PC 245 (A)(1)).
Results: After negotiating with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to get the case dismissed!
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor DUI for being under the influence of a drug (VC 23152(E)) out of the Rancho Cucamonga courthouse.
Results: After negotiations with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to reduce the charge to a wet reckless (VC 23103).
Charges: Client was charged with his second misdemeanor DUI (VC 23152 (a) and (b)) out of the Pomona Courthouse. His BAC was 0.16%.
Results: The case was set aside and the DMV took no action against our client!
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor DUI (VC 23152 (a)) out of Los Angeles County.
Results: The case was set aside, and the DMV took no action against our client!
Charges: Client was accused of rape (PC 261) and was facing serious charges out of Los Angeles County.
Results: After extensive negotiations with the District Attorney’s Office, The University Committee Board, Chief of Civil Rights Officer, and Title IX Coordinator, our attorneys were able to shield our client from any criminal charges being filed against him.
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor burglary (PC 459) out of the Rancho Cucamonga Courthouse.
Results: After negotiations with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to get this case dismissed!
Charges: Client violated her probation under Prop 36 and was driving without a license (VC 12500) in San Bernardino County.
Results: Our attorneys were able to get her reinstated into Prop 36 with no further penalties and her driving without a license charge was dismissed!
Charges: Client was facing a misdemeanor battery charge (PC 242) out of the Rancho Cucamonga Courthouse.
Results: After negotiations with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to get the case dismissed!
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor marijuana DUI (VC 23152 (a) and (b)) out of the Rancho Cucamonga Courthouse.
Results: Our attorneys were able to reduce the charges down to a wet reckless (VC 23103). Our client had to attend a wet reckless driving class, was put on probation, and had to pay a fine.
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor DUI (VC 23152 (a) and (b)) out of the Rancho Cucamonga Courthouse.
Results: Our attorneys were able to reduce the charges down to a wet reckless (VC 23103). Our client had to attend a wet reckless driving class, was put on probation, and had to pay a fine.
Charges: Client was pulled over for speeding but ended up getting charged with a DUI (VC 23152 (a) and (b)) out of the Rancho Cucamonga Courthouse.
Results: Our attorneys were able to reduce the charges down to a wet reckless charge (VC 23103). Our client had to attend a wet reckless driving class, was put on probation, and had to pay a fine.
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor DUI (VC 23152 (a) and (b)) out of the Rancho Cucamonga Courthouse.
Results: Our attorneys were able to reduce the charges down to a wet reckless charge (VC 23103). Our client had to attend a wet reckless driving class, was put on probation, and had to pay a fine.
Charges: Client was being charged with a DUI (VC 23152 (a) and (b)) out of the Rancho Cucamonga Courthouse.
Results: Our attorneys were able to reduce the charges down to a wet reckless charge (VC 23103). Our client had to attend a wet reckless driving class, was put on probation, and had to pay a fine.
Charges: Client was charged with possession of a controlled substance (HS 11377) and for violating a written promise to appear in court (PC 853.7) out of the San Bernardino Courthouse.
Results: After extensive negotiations with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to get the charges dismissed! No charges were filed against our client.
Charges: Client was charged with a DUI while on DUI probation (VC 23154 (a)), out of the Rancho Cucamonga Courthouse.
Results: Our attorneys were able to get the case dismissed!
Charges: Client was charged with driving on a suspended license (VC 14601.1) and violating his probation (PC 1203).
Results: After negotiating with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to dismiss the driving on a suspended license charge and got the violation of probation charge reduced to an infraction.
Charges: Our client was charged with three DUI’s (VC 23152 (a) and (b)) all within approximately 10 days of one another and two were in the same county.
Results: After extensive negotiations with the District Attorneys, our attorneys were able to reduce two of those DUI’s to wet reckless charges (VC 23103). Our client had to attend a wet reckless driving class for both of those cases, was put on probation, and had some fines to pay.
Charges: Client was charged with being drunk in public (PC 647) out of the Rancho Cucamonga Courthouse.
Results: After negotiating with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to reduce the charge down to a disturbing the peace infraction (PC 415)!
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor for willful cruelty to a child PC 273 (a) out of the Rancho Cucamonga Courthouse.
Results: After negotiations, the District Attorney was willing to dismiss the case if our client completed parenting classes. Our client successfully completed the parenting classes and then our attorneys got the case dismissed!
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor DUI (VC 23152 (a) and (b)), and driving on a suspended license (VC 14601) out of the Rancho Cucamonga Courthouse.
Results: After negotiations with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to reduce the DUI charge to a wet reckless charge (VC 23103). Our client had to attend a wet reckless driving class, was put on probation, and had to pay a fine. Our attorneys got the driving with a suspended license charge dismissed!
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor for being drunk in public (PC 647) out of the Rancho Cucamonga Courthouse.
Results: After negotiating with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to get the case dismissed!
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor DUI (VC 23152 (a) and (b)) out of the Rancho Cucamonga Courthouse.
Results: After negotiating with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to reduce the charges down to a wet reckless (VC 23103). Our client had to attend a wet reckless driving class, was put on probation, and had to pay a fine.
Charges: Client was being charged with a misdemeanor DUI (VC 23152 (a) and (b)) out of the Rancho Cucamonga Courthouse.
Results: After negotiating with the District Attorney, our attorneys were able to reduce the charges to a wet reckless (VC 23103). Our client had to attend an alcohol first offender class, was put on probation and had a fine to pay.
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor for possession of a controlled substance (HS 11350) out of the Rancho Cucamonga Courthouse.
Results: After negotiating with the District Attorney our attorneys were able to get the case dismissed!
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor DUI (VC 23152 (a) and (b)) and also for driving without a license (VC 12500) out of the Rancho Cucamonga Courthouse. His BAC was 0.17%.
Results: The case was set aside and the DMV took no action against our client.
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor marijuana DUI (VC 23152 (a) and (b)) out of the Rancho Cucamonga Courthouse.
Results: The case was set aside and the DMV took no action against our client.
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor DUI (VC 23152 (a) and (b)) out of the Pomona Courthouse.
Results: The case was set aside and the DMV took no action against our client.
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor DUI (VC 23152 (a) and (b)) out of the Rancho Cucamonga Courthouse. His BAC was 0.26%.
Results: The case was set aside and the DMV took no action against our client.
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor DUI (VC 23152 (a) and (b)) out of the Rancho Cucamonga Courthouse.
Results: The case was set aside and the DMV took no action against our client.
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor DUI (VC 23152 (a) and (b)) out of the Pomona Courthouse. His BAC was 0.22%.
Results: The case was set aside and the DMV took no action against our client.
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor DUI (VC 23152 (a) and (b)) out of the Riverside Courthouse. Her BAC was 0.11%.
Results: The case was set aside and the DMV took no action against our client.
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor DUI (VC 23152 (a) and (b)) out of the Riverside Courthouse.
Results: The case was set aside and the DMV took no action against our client.
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor DUI (VC 23152 (e)) out of the Rancho Cucamonga Courthouse.
Results: The case was set aside and the DMV took no action against our client.
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor DUI (VC 23152 (a) and (b)) out of the San Bernardino Courthouse.
Results: The case was set aside and the DMV took no action against our client.
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor DUI (VC 23152 (a) and (b)) out of the San Bernardino Courthouse.
Results: Initially, the DMV ruled against our client and suspended his driving privileges for one year. Our attorneys filed an appeal based on the fact that our client was not properly admonished, as required by law. Our appeal was granted and the matter was set side!
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor DUI (VC 23152 (a)) and reckless driving (VC 23103 (a)) out of the Rancho Cucamonga Courthouse. His BAC was 0.11%.
Results: Initially, the DMV ruled against our client and suspended his driving privileges for four months. Our attorneys filed an appeal and the matter was set side!
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor D.U.I. (V.C. 23152(a)) with both alcohol and marijuana involved.
Result: Attorney Bobby Shamuilian was able to get his charges knocked down to a dry reckless with 12 months of informal probation and no classes!
Charges: Client charged with Misdemeanor D.U.I. (V.C. 23152(a) V.C. 23152(b) out of Murrieta Riverside.
Results: After filing extensive motions, the District Attorney reduced to a Wet and Reckless (V.C. 23103)
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor D.U.I. (V.C. 23152(a) and V.C. 23152(b)).
Results: A Motion to Suppress the Evidence was filed and granted by Judge. It was appealed by the DA, but the decision to suppress the chemical test results was upheld by the Appellate Court. The DA offered to dismiss the DUI and instead, added a third count, a moving violation infraction.
Charges: Client was arrested for felony False Imprisonment (P.C. 236) and charged with Battery (P.C. 242).
Results: After filing various motions, the DA dropped the felony charge and added an amended charge of misdemeanor Disturbing the Peace (P.C. 415(2)), with no jail time, just fees, fines, and summary probation.
Charges: Client was charged with a second time misdemeanor D.U.I. (V.C. 23152(a) and V.C. 23152(b)).
Results: A Motion to Suppress the Evidence was filed and the DA offered to dismiss the DUI, offering our client an infraction for Possessing an Open Container While Driving (V.C. 123222(A).
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor Petty Theft (P.C. M484(A) / 490.5(A)) for taking merchandise from a major national retail store.
Results: After going back and forth with the DA, our attorneys were able to get the charge down to a misdemeanor Trespassing (P.C. M602) with no jail time, just fees, fines and summary probation.
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor D.U.I. (V.C. 23152(a) and V.C. 23152(b)). He is a commercial driver and was at risk of losing his commercial driver’s license.
Results: The attorneys were able to show that there was insufficient evidence to convict the client of a D.U.I. A Judgment of Acquittal was filed and granted by the Judge. The DA offered a misdemeanor Reckless Driving charge (V.C. 23103(A)), with no jail time, just fees, fines, summary probation and the client was able to keep his commercial license.
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor Battery on Spouse (P.C. M243(E)(1)).
Results: Our attorneys were able to show that there was insufficient evidence to convict our client and he was able to get the charge dismissed!
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor Corporal Injury on a Spouse (P.C. M273.5(A)).
Results: Case dismissed! Our client attended counselling and was able to move forward with her life and career.
Charges: Client was charged with a first-time misdemeanor D.U.I. (V.C. 23152(a)). He sped through a checkpoint and slammed on his brakes. His speech was slurred according to the Officer’s audio recording.
Results: After careful review of the evidence, our attorneys were able to get the case dismissed!
Charges: Client was charged with two felony counts, Rape (P.C. 261(A)(2)) and Oral Copulation by Force/Fear of Bodily Injury (P.C. 288A(C)(2)(A)) after his girlfriend made false allegations against him. He was facing life in prison if convicted.
Results: The attorneys were able to get his charges down to an Assault (P.C. 245(A)(4) and no registration as a sex offender. He was also given credit for time served.
Charges: Client was charged with a felony count for a Lewd Act with a Child (P.C. 288(a)).
Results: Our attorneys took this case to trial and the client was found not guilty on all counts!
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor for being an Accessory to a Felony (P.C. M32).
Results: Our attorneys were able to get the entire case dismissed!
Charges: Prior to the preliminary hearing, the client was charged with nine felony counts and facing life in prison. Four of those felony counts, including Kidnapping (P.C. 207(A)), Assault with a Firearm (P.C. 245(A)(2)) and Attempted Murder (P.C. 664/187(A)), were discharged. The client was held to answer on the five remaining felony counts for Kidnapping (P.C. 207(A)), Assault with a Firearm (P.C. 245(A)(2)), Assault with a Deadly Weapon (P.C. 245(A)(1)), Participation in a Criminal Street Gang (P.C. 186.22(A)), and Felon in Possession of a Firearm (P.C. 29800(A)).
Results: Despite facing nine felony counts, the client took a deal for only one felony count, Assault with a Firearm (P.C. 245(A)(2)). The other four felony counts were completely dismissed!
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor for Disorderly Conduct (P.C. M647(F)).
Results: In the end, the client was able to walk away with just an infraction for Fighting; Noise; Offensive Words (P.C. 1415).
Charges: Client was charged with a misdemeanor for Grand Theft by Embezzlement (P.C. 487(A)) for taking approximately $18,000 cash from a retail store where she worked.
Results: The client was sentenced to work release, probation and no nights in jail.
Charges: Client retained our office to represent him on his second D.U.I. (V.C. 23152(a) and (b)). While we were defending his case, he picked up a third D.U.I. (V.C. 23152(a) and (b)). In both instances, his blood alcohol content exceeded 0.20.
Results: In the end, the client walked away with no jail time; just fees, fines and summary probation.
Charges: Client was facing three felony counts for Possession of a Controlled Substance for Sale (H.S. 11378), Possession of a Controlled Substance while Armed with a Loaded Firearm (H.S. 11370.1(A)) and Using a False Compartment for Storage of a Controlled Substance (H.S. 11366.8(A)).
Results: The attorneys were able to get two of the charges completely dismissed – Possession of a Controlled Substance for Sale (H.S. 11378) and Possession of a Controlled Substance while Armed with a Loaded Firearm (H.S. 11370.1(A)). The client took a deal for the transportation charge. He was placed on probation with 90 days of work release.
Charges: The client was a co-defendant in a murder case. He was charged with a felony for being an Accessory After the Fact (P.C. 32).
Results: The client was sentenced to formal probation for one year.